A proud member of the Forces of Darkness

Thursday, December 16, 2010

Murder is rarely the first crime

Our favorite gun grabber japete has spent her later years pushing gun control because her sister was murdered in 1992 by Russell Lund Jr., “The only son of the founder of Lund’s Inc., the Minneapolis food, oil, and real estate empire.” Wanting to know more about this crime, I ran across a book, Greed, Rage, and Love Gone Wrong, Murder in Minnesota, by Bruce Rubenstein. There is even a Google Books review online with most of the pages of the relevant chapter.

I will take japete at her word that she simply wants to spare other people the horror of their family members getting murdered. She’s also maintained that her brother-in-law, the murderer, had “undiagnosed mental illness,” but was “he was not a criminal or had trouble with the police.” This part, however, is not true at all. He was twice arrested for shoplifting, and had been diagnosed as a kleptomaniac. He was also 3rd banana in an "airline" that turned out to be a total fraud.

"It was a paper facade that fabricated phantom revenues to lure real investors.
For a while it was a spectacular success. Shrewd bankers gave the company loans that were never paid, to buy airplanes that were never purchased. Reputable law firms papered transactions that never happened and got stiffed for their fees. Three stock offerings backed by phony revenues yielded more than $30 million.
...
Russell Lund Jr. was one of the few that emerged unscathed. Prosecutors and law enforcement officers agreed that Russ was a pawn and a dupe and such a dunce when it came to business that he couldn't possible have been culpable.
Nevertheless, for years after the trial Russ figured strongly in rumors that Flight Transportation Corp. flew cash to offshore banks for rich Twin Citians so they could evade taxes.
...
Russ left a packet of information about the Flight Transportation affair with a KSTP-TV reporter shortly before he murdered his wife and her lover. The killings short-circuited any plans the station might have had to follow up. The contents of the packet have never been made public."

The whole thrust of the chapter devoted to this murderer is that the author believes that Russell Lund Jr’s wealth and personal friendship with the Minnetonka Chief of Police insulated him from the consequences of his actions. It’s hard to say from this distance, using only Rubenstein’s book, if he is correct. The #1 and #2 people in the Flight Transportation fraud received 35 and 25 year sentences for their roles, and the company attorney and 5 employees were either convicted or plead guilty to charges relating to the Flight Transportation scam. Was Russell Lund Jr. involved? We may never know. It’s hard to see how he could be unaware that millions of dollars were being scammed right under his nose, but it is possible. One thing’s for sure. If he was let walk by a friend or someone who was influenced by his wealth, that person must be feeling pretty guilty. Had Lund been jailed, it’s unlikely that he’d have been available to murder his estranged wife.

The most important thing to know about this is, the person who murdered japete’s sister was not the slightly odd, but perfectly law abiding citizen that japete insists he was. This matches what I have maintained all along. Normal people do not suddenly snap and murder people. Even in domestic murder cases, where you’d expect the correlation between prior criminality and murder to be weakest,


It is important to remember this. The gun grabbers want to paint gun owners as one short step from snapping and going on a murderous rampage. If they can convince non-gun owners that the nice guy next door who has a gun might someday kill them, they can get more votes for gun control. What happens when non-gun owners realize that it isn’t their law abiding neighbor with a gun that is the threat, but the known criminal who is the threat? The gun grabbers wish to keep us isolated from our neighbors by fear. They want to engender fear in the minds of our neighbors in order to turn that fear into power, power to take your gun.

I have no idea if japete knows better and is lying, or if she’s convinced that this lie is true. In the end it doesn’t matter much. The important thing is to keep telling the truth. Murder is mostly the province of the criminal class. Past behavior best predicts future results. A tiger does not change its spots. Possession of a gun, nor possession of a license to carry that gun concealed, indicates a possible future murderer. In fact, judging by the extremely low revocation rate of carry licenses, probably the best thing a woman could do to check up on a prospective boyfriend is to ask to see his Concealed Carry license. Let’s face it. Hiring a PI to do a background check is expensive. The Concealed Carry license tells you that the State has already done that check.

11 comments:

  1. I think it is part and parcel of what an admitted control advocate found when he rigged his study to highlight the dangers of firearms.
    Variable Adjusted Odds Ratio
    ---------------------------------------------------
    Illicit drug use 5.7
    Home rented 4.4
    Any household member hit or 4.4
    hurt in a fight in the home
    Case subject or control 3.7
    lived alone
    Gun or guns kept in the home 2.7
    Any household member arrested 2.5

    Illicit Drug use, history of violence both have higher correlation then firearm ownership -- even after Kellermann rigged the study.

    Prior arrest record is almost as high as firearm ownership.

    Think of what an honest study would find.

    Wonder why Joan Peterson won't come clean about her brother in law's arrest record?

    Perhaps it is because it would damage her narrative and claims we have to restrict law abiding gun owners.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have a couple questions if you don't mind.

    In what context was he diagnosed with Kleptomania?
    Was that a defense to his shoplifting offenses?
    If so what was the response of the court?
    Was treatment of this mental illness ordered by the court?

    It looks to me like he may have been a prohibited person as per Minnesota law.

    (3) a person who is or has ever been committed in Minnesota or elsewhere by a judicial determination that the person is mentally ill, developmentally disabled, or mentally ill and dangerous to the public, as defined in section 253B.02, to a treatment facility, or who has ever been found incompetent to stand trial or not guilty by reason of mental illness, unless the person's ability to possess a firearm has been restored under subdivision 4;

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think it is unlikely that someone would be ruled mentally incompetent over two shoplifting charges. It does make me wonder about the guy. He was really wealthy by most standards, yet he was shoplifting. Couple that with the Flight Transportation scam and I start to wonder if he was allowed to slide by because of his wealth.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I've got the book coming from the library for xmas reading...

    Whats really funny about Joan is when you can tell she's out of her element, and the responses are one-word and/or "nonsense".

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sean, you are correct. Check out "The Myth of the Out of Character Crime" by Dr. Stanton Samenow.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anon I've added it to my Amazon wish list and I've ordered a copy through Interlibrary loan. Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  7. "...even after Kellermann rigged the study."

    Arthur Kellerman's study is bogus because he used the wrong methodology. Case-control works when the treatment population is randomly selected. Theoretically, if he put a gun into a random subset of the households, then compared shooting incidents to the control (no gun) households, he'd have meaningful results.

    The main reason his odds were so exaggerated is that already-violent households may be more likely to have a gun. It's called self selection bias and it's amazing the NEJM editors let it slide.

    The point is, anti-gun people are dug into academia (especially the public health field) like ticks. And I'm a guy who makes a living publishing these papers, so I know!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Woo hoo, Santa saw "the Myth of the Out of Character Crime" on my Amazon wishlist and brought me a copy for Christmas.

    ReplyDelete
  9. What did you think of the book?

    ReplyDelete
  10. It was a good book. It did dwell upon the obvious, though. The main point of the book is that people don't do things that are out of character. Basically the guy was saying that if your view of a person's character and the actions of that person are in conflict, then it's your view that is mistaken. It's worth the time to read. If you don't want to buy it, go to the library and ask for it through interlibrary loan.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Oh, I have my own well worn copy. Having worked juvie corrections it was nice to find a guy like Samenow validating what I saw in front of me every day.

    ReplyDelete

Like what you read? Have extra money and want to donate it to a good cause? Look on the right sidebar for the Paypal button labled "Contribute to the 'Buy a Kriss Vector' fund" All proceeds go to funding my purchase of a Kriss Vector SBR and suppressor.

Anyone (except for MikeB302000) can post.

Don’t be more of an ass than me. Your words, though they are on my blog, are your own. I didn’t write them. If they are stupid, ill considered, or bigoted, it’s your problem.

Criminal threats will be reported to the appropriate authorities for the appropriate action.